![]() |
Caledonia Class Action Website |
|
|
| Home | Case Developments | Compensation Plan And Applications | Lawyer Profiles | Contact Us | Press | |
|
Class Action Statement of Claim Press Release Motion Marshall Judgment Press Release Order Press Release Notice of Motion for Certification Press Release Decision Plaintiffs' Factum Attorney General's Motion for Case Management Attorney General's Case Management Factum Plaintiff's Case Management Factum Haldimand County Rule 20 Motion Record Plaintiff's Rule 20 Responding Motion Record Attorney General Rule 21 Notice of Motion Attorney General Rule 21 Factum Haldimand County Rule 20 Factum Plaintiff's Rule 20 Factum Haldimand County Rule 20 Supplementary Motion Record Judgment of Justice Crane Plaintiff's Responding Factum Plaintiff's Proposed Amended Statement of Claim Hearing Decision of Justice Crane Order of Justice Crane Press Release Motion by Attorney General for Leave to Appeal Order Factum of Attorney General for Motion for Leave to Appeal Factum of the Plaintiffs Responding to Motion for Leave Reasons of Justice Walter Stayshyn dismissing Crown motion for leave to appeal Endorsement on Costs of Justice Stayshyn awarding costs to the plaintiffs on the Attorney General's motion for leave to appeal the Order of Justice Crane Supplementary Motion Record for Certification Plaintiffs' Supplementary Factum Reasons of Justice Crane certifying the action as a class proceeding. Order of Justice Crane Judgement of Justice Crane Order of Justice Crane Caledonia Compensation Plan Order of Justice Crane |
CASE DEVELOPMENTSJune 12, 2006 A class action was commenced under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992 in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Cayuga, Ontario, Canada.
June 12, 2006 Statement of ClaimJune 12, 2006 Press ReleaseJune 14, 2006 Province of Ontario given notice under the Proceedings against the Crown Act of intended claim by the Plaintiffs.
August 8, 2006 Judgment of Justice T. D. Marshall in Henco Industries Limited v. Haudenosaunee Six Nations Confederacy Council et al.August 11, 2006 Press ReleaseAugust 25, 2006 Order of Court of Appeal re stay of Justice Marshall's Judgment
September 26, 2006 Press ReleaseNovember 24, 2006 Notice of Motion for Certification(Revised January 12, 2007) November 30, 2006 Press ReleaseDecember 13, 2006 Decision of Court of Appeal on appeal of Justice Marshall's Judgment
January 12, 2007 Plaintiffs' FactumCase Management Motion April 10, 2007 This includes the actions of Brown and Chatwell v. Her Majesty, Railink Canada Ltd. v. Her Majesty and Fasano v. The Provincial Government of Ontario. Attorney General's Motion for Case Management pdfApril 13, 2007 Attorney General's Case Management FactumApril 16, 2007 Plaintiff's Case Management FactumApril 18, 2007 Haldimand County Rule 20 Summary Judgment Motion June 5, 2007 Haldimand County Rule 20 Motion RecordJune 6, 2007 Plaintiff's Rule 20 Responding Motion Record
June 14, 2007 Haldimand County Rule 20 Factum June 18, 2007 Plaintiff's Rule 20 Factum June 19, 2007 Haldimand County Supplementary Motion RecordJune 20, 2007 July 30, 2007 Judgment of Justice Crane pdfAugust 1, 2007 Attorney General’s Rule 21 Motion to Strike Statement of Claim The motion was heard on September 25 and 26, 2007 at the John Sopinka Court House, Hamilton, Ontario. June 7, 2007 Attorney General Rule 21 Notice of MotionJune 8, 2007 Attorney General Rule 21 FactumSeptember 14, 2007 Plaintiff's Responding FactumSeptember 25, 2007 Proposed Amended Statement of Claim submitted by Plaintiffs. September 25 and 26, 2007 Hearing of Attorney General’s Rule 21 motion before Justice David Crane.
December 21, 2007 Decision of Justice David Crane on Attorney General’s Rule 21 motionDecember 21, 2007 Order of Justice Crane dated December 21, 2007January 2, 2008 Press ReleaseAttorney General’s Motion for Leave to Appeal Order to Divisional Court January 11, 2008 Motion by Attorney General for Leave to Appeal Order to Divisional CourtApril 23, 2008 Factum of Attorney General for Motion for Leave to AppealApril 28, 2008 Factum of the Plaintiffs Responding to Motion for LeaveMay 29, 2008
Reasons of Justice Walter Stayshyn dismissing Crown motion for leave to appeal.July 30, 2008
Endorsement on Costs of Justice Stayshyn awarding costs to the plaintiffs on the Attorney General's motion for leave to appeal the Order of Justice Crane. Plaintiffs' Motion for Certification May 29, 2009
Supplementary Motion Record for Certification.October 8, 2009
Plaintiffs' Supplementary Factum.February 8, 2010
Reasons of Justice Crane certifying the action as a class proceeding.February 8, 2010
Order of Justice Crane dated February 8, 2010.July 8, 2011
Judgement of Justice Crane dated July 8, 2011.September 28, 2011
Order of Justice Crane dated September 28, 2011.November 21, 2011
Caledonia Compensation PlanNovember 21, 2011
Order of Justice Crane dated November 21, 2011.Forms and information pertaining to a submission for compensation under the settlement of the Caledonia class action can be found on the Compensation and Applications Page. |
|
| Home | Case Developments | Compensation Plan | Lawyer Profiles | FAQ's | Contact Us | Press | |
Website and its contents copyright © Findlay McCarthy LLP, 2006-2011. |
![]() |